HAWX PRIME 120 S GW

<!--begin-bvseo-reviews--> <!--begin-reviews--> <div id="bvseo-reviewsSection"> <div class="bvseo-review" itemprop="review" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Review" data-reviewid="1086153451"> <span itemprop="reviewRating" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Rating"> Rated <span itemprop="ratingValue">1</span> out of <span itemprop="bestRating">5</span> </span> by <span itemprop="author" itemtype="https://schema.org/Person" itemscope><span itemprop="name">Jason</span></span> from <span itemprop="name">Awful! Very Misleading 120 Flex and Cheap Strap</span> <span itemprop="description">First the good - These boots are the lightest and most laterally responsive boots I have ever skied. The are incredibly quick with amazing snow feel and ski great on blue groomers. They are almost the best boots I've ever skied but... Now the BAD- 120 flex is a ridiculous overstatement! I've coming off Fischer (120 & 130 flex) boots and Rossignol (120 flex) boots where I had to remove rear spine bolts to soften the flex. This boot's stiffness is not even in the same ball park as those others. Essentially it's a great beginner or intermediate boot but not anywhere near the "strong flex" which I'm quoting from this boot's official description. As soon as I get off a groomer and ski medium bumps or choppy snow where I need to drive the ski these boots colipase in the forward flex like a soggy French fry; even after I added the 2nd spine bolt. Ugh! It's so frustrating to ski a high end boot with premium price tag only to find I overpaid for a recreational boot. In fact I've stopped skiing them because that lousy flex has caused me back problems which don't occur in my older boots. It goes to show that there's a price to be paid both at the store and on the mountain for boot's significant weight loss. For reference I'm a life long expert skier weighing 173 lbs. Maybe the plastic on these boots didn't cure correctly and my pair is defective. However I don't know how I can back up that claim for warranty. Also I can't believe the boot designers at Atomic were ok with so badly and intentionally mislabeling the flex rating.</span> <div class="bvseo-pubdate">Date published: 2020-12-22</div> <meta itemprop="datePublished" content="2020-12-22" /> </div> </div> <script type="text/javascript"> if (document.getElementById('bvseo-reviewsSection')) { document.getElementById('bvseo-reviewsSection').style.display = 'none'; } </script> <!--end-reviews--> <ul id="BVSEO_meta" style="display:none!important"> <li data-bvseo="bvDateModified">y_2026, m_8, d_9, h_10</li> <li data-bvseo="ps">bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.48</li> <li data-bvseo="cp">cp_1, bvpage1</li> <li data-bvseo="co">co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_4</li> <li data-bvseo="cf">loc_en_US, sid_AE5026640_bv36_, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RATING, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]</li> <li data-bvseo="diagnostics">clientName_atomic</li> </ul> <!--end-bvseo-reviews--> <ul id="BVSEOSDK_meta" style="display:none !important;"> <li data-bvseo="sdk">bvseo_sdk, p_sdk, 3.2.1</li> <li data-bvseo="sp_mt">CLOUD, getReviews, 13.2ms</li> <li data-bvseo="ct_st">REVIEWS, PRODUCT</li> </ul>